We are happy to announce the release of our Blu-Ray/DVD combo Elle a passé tant d'heures sous les sunlights... by Philippe Garrel. Available for order here : https://bit.ly/3PERuoD
Below is a brief analysis of the film by our colleague Ana Catarina F. Araújo.
ENGLISH VERSION ( version français en bas)
Elle a passé tant d'heures sous les sunlights... by
Philippe Garrel, presents the perfect construction for conveying
something that stems from subjectivity. It seems to be, before anything
else, a film about the filmmaker's most intimate questions at that point
in time (1985). The picture seemingly alternates between on the one
hand Garrel's personal life, and on the other his chosen medium.
Therefore, there is something quite material – in the Marxist sense of
the word – that merges with the empirical. This fusion pierces the
screen not only through the extremely complex narrative but also, and at
the same level, through the aesthetic choices.
In Elle a passé... we meet the characters of Christa (Anne Wiazemsky), Jacques (Jacques Bonnaffé), Marie (Mireille Perrier) and Gracq (Lou Castel). We also follow Philippe Garrel; we also observe and listen to Chantal Ackerman as well as Jacques Doillon. One understands quickly that this is in fact a film (or more) within a film, navigating across several cinematic genres at the same time as it refers to several periods of film history (in a very Garrelian fashion). Finally, it is a film that cannot seem to avoid carrying a certain social critique and activism.
In the first fifteen minutes, a game of doubles is presented: Christa (a double for Nico whose birth name was Christa Päffgen, Garrel's ex-lover in real life) becomes Jacques' ex-lover (in all likelihood Garrel's double in the film). Jacques will then become the lover of Marie who will give birth to his son (possibly referring to Louis, Garrel's son with Brigitte Sy, the film's co-writer). Still in these first fifteen minutes, a mise en abyme is made evident: after the title card "Les Ministères de L'art" we meet Marie as we watch her face in a close-up shot, listening, as attentively as the spectator, to the voice of the director. He's explaining how he used his love for Christa in order to please the audience, but that their relationship can no longer exist because it is detrimental to his art. In the minutes that follow, we witness Marie sitting on her car waiting for Jacques. He arrives, they kiss and enter the car. Up to here the spectator's questioning emanates from the doubling of the characters as well as from the resulting blending of the real and imaginary, yet it isn't until the moment when the image of the couple in their car cuts to black, that another dimension is exposed. The clapperboard authorizes here the beginning of another scene, this time in medium shots, one soon notices that the sequence is repeating, the film within the film thus making a brutal appearance.
Furthermore, a documentary dimension joins this autobiographic discourse. This is in addition to Garrel playing in his own film, in spite of the fact that Jacques is presented as his fictional double, to the recurrent mises en abyme that grow increasingly complex becoming almost fractal, and to the presence of out of frame elements and the extra-filmic space, all of which unveil the self-reflexive dimension of the film.
In addition, one hears reflections on the nature of cinema in each of the narrative layers. The director asks himself questions regarding how much his life feeds his work and vice-versa. He informs us about the difficulties in the making of his film: having trouble finding ways to finance it, he sees himself forced to sell heroine, or when all is ready to start shooting but the film stock hasn't arrived. He goes as far as filming documentary scenes with his peers Chantal Ackerman and Jacques Doillon. It is essential to note that in a majority of these scenes, either in voice-over or on screen, it is Garrel himself that expresses his questioning (despite the existence of his double Jacques). Hence the reflexivity of this work doesn't originate solely from his aesthetic choices – visible clapperboards, the noises of the camera motor, visible microphones, end of the roll flashes, directions given to the camera operator, etc. – no, the subject (or subjects) brilliantly addressed here by Garrel, seem to impose this very unique construction.
Gracq is the representative character for the antiestablishment spirit of the Nouvelle Vague and May 68, he is the anarchist that is ready to make use of violence in order to see true change, he is also the man for whom Marie leaves Jacques. Gracq seems to be the personification of the subversive and materialist side of this film, taking increasingly more space as the story evolves, this is why what he represents will end up overflowing his character. A long silent scene asserts the critical side of the film when Jacques kisses Marie – between the bed sheets shared with Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, a reminder of Gracq and the materialist and critical dimensions that he represents – and then leaves. The scene doesn't stop here, the spectator stares at Marie, lying next to Marx's book, until Garrel enters the frame and comes to kiss Marie, taking the place of his double. Minutes later, Marie ends up returning to Gracq and running away with this representative of the socio-economic critique of the film. This critical dimension seems to pierce through each and every layer of this composite creation that hovers between real and imaginary up until one loses sight of the line that separates them.
Elle a passé tant d'heures sous les Sunlights... is
a film that encompasses an artist and his art. From the process to the
result, Garrel gives us full access to his intimacy as well as to his
own subjectivity. This film feeds directly from works created by the
artist prior to 1985 and will then go on to nourish his subsequent
projects. Elle a passé... is a central work in the filmography of this prodigy of the french avant-garde.
-Ana Catarina F. Araújo
EN FRANÇAIS
Elle a passé tant d'heures sous les sunlights... (1985), un film de Philippe Garrel, semble avoir la construction parfaite pour faire part de quelque chose de l'ordre du subjectif, il semble être avant tout un film sur des questionnements intimes de l'auteur à ce moment. Le film parait montrer la communication et le croisement constant entre, d'une part le vécu personnel de Garrel, et de l'autre son support de prédilection. Il y a donc quelque chose de très matériel – au sens Marxiste du terme – qui s'entremêle à quelque chose de l'ordre de l’empirique. Ce mélange de préoccupations transperce l’écran non seulement à travers la construction narrative extrêmement complexe mais également, et au même titre, à travers les choix esthétiques.
Dans Elle a passé... nous rencontrons les personnages de Christa (Anne Wiazemsky), Jacques (Jacques Bonnaffé), Marie (Mireille Perrier) et Gracq (Lou Castel). Nous suivons également Philippe Garrel ; nous écoutons et observons aussi Chantal Ackerman ainsi que Jacques Doillon. Nous nous rendons compte assez vite que ce film est en effet deux, voir plus ; qu'il traverse les codes de plusieurs genres cinématographiques tout en faisant référence à plusieurs périodes de l'histoire du cinéma (de façon bien Garrelienne). Finalement, c'est un film qui ne peut pas s’empêcher d'être porteur d'une critique sociale et d'un certain militantisme.
En outre, il existe une dimension documentaire en plus de ce discours autobiographique. Elle vient s'ajouter au fait que Garrel joue dans son propre film (malgré le fait que Jacques soit présenté comme étant son double fictionnel), mais aussi aux mises en abyme récurrentes qui deviennent de plus en plus complexes et presque fractales, et à la présence du hors-cadre et de l'espace extra-filmique. Tout ceci vient dévoiler la dimension auto-réflexive du film.
On peut aussi noter qu'il existe une réflexion sur la nature du cinéma, et ceci dans chacune des couches narratives. Le réalisateur se pose des question sur combien sa vie nourri son cinema et vice-versa. Il nous fait part des difficultés rencontrées dans la fabrication de son film : ayant des difficultés pour trouver des moyens de financement, il se voit obligé de vendre de l’héroïne, où alors quand tout est prêt pour démarrer le tournage mais la pellicule n'est pas arrivée. Il va jusqu'à filmer des séquences documentaires avec ses camarades Chantal Ackerman et Jacques Doillon. Il est essentiel de noter que dans une grande partie de ces séquences, qu'elles soient en voix-off, ou bien avec le cinéaste dans le champ, c'est Garrel lui même qui incarne son questionnement (malgré l'existence de son double Jacques). Donc la réflexivité de cette œuvre ne provient pas que des choix esthétiques – l'apparition de claps, les bruitages du moteur de la caméra, la perche visible, les flashs de fin de bobine, les directions donnés directement au caméraman, etc. – non, le sujet (ou les sujets) traités ici brillamment par Garrel, semblent imposer cette construction unique.
Elle a passé tant d'heures sous les Sunlights... est un film qui englobe un artiste et son art. Du processus jusqu'au résultat, Garrel nous donne accès à son intimité ainsi qu'à sa propre subjectivité. Ce film se nourrit directement des œuvres crées par le cinéaste avant 1985 et il alimentera par la suite les créations ultérieures de l'auteur. Elle a passé... est une œuvre phare dans la filmographie de l'auteur prodige du cinéma d'avant garde français.
- Ana Catarina F. Araújo
DISPONIBLE ICI : https://bit.ly/3PERuoD